Markets and coercive aggregation

Daniel Little has yet another interesting post, this one on the topic of aggregation dynamics:

The social world starts with social individuals. So how do we get more complex social outcomes out of the actions and thoughts of independent individuals? How do the actions and thoughts of individuals aggregate into larger social happenings? How did the various religious, political, and relational attitudes of rural Kenyans aggregate to widespread ethnic violence a few years ago? What sorts of conditions lead to interactions that bring about unexpected outcomes? And, of course, how do larger social happenings impinge upon individuals, leading to characteristic kinds of socialized behavior?

Markets are theoretically an efficient mechanism for aggregating social and economic preferences. I think that’s already an overly strong statement, but accepting that for the moment, what about cases where markets are imposed rather than chosen? I’m thinking specifically of instances where the state decides to pursue market-based policies as solutions to social and political problems. Citizens then don’t have much of a choice of whether to participate or not, especially if the market is for a necessity like food. I am purely writing from my own interests, but it strikes me that the interaction of states, markets and society can often be more productively framed as a form of coercive aggregation, which is the exact opposite of the assumption of “aggregated preferences” that informs market-based theory.

The mechanism here is key. It seems to me that when the political system turns to markets, it effectively aggregates the multidimensional needs, risk tolerances and other characteristics of millions of individuals into a block of undifferentiated demand. That demand is delivered to a market, which through its own mechanism combines that demand with n other factors into a more or less volatile single output – price. Through that price, the market then diffuses a single stream of volatility back into the population, which sounds good in theory but in reality leaves individuals with far fewer degrees of freedom to adjust if the volatility is in the wrong direction. As a result, market forces paradoxically impose a collective outcome (typically, though not always, in the form of price) that overrides any possibility of the individual choice used to argue for markets in the first place.

Which brings me back to the topic of Little’s post. There is a direct line from food riots that have erupted again in the ‘third world’ (it is past time to come up with a better term)  back to decisions made over the past few decades to turn away from local development of food resources and toward spot markets. When things go well, as they did when commodity prices were generally falling in the years before 2003, that ends up being a beneficial decision in the short run. We are now seeing the long-run results.

That’s an admittedly materialist interpretation, but we do seem to be living in materialist days.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Coercive aggregation, Finance and capital markets, Food markets & development. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Markets and coercive aggregation

  1. Pingback: Coercive aggregation and the poor | aluation

  2. rogerglewis says:

    This Theme is a very strong one in considering the continuing crisis both in respect of Sovereign debt crises and the double dip in the Housing Markets. There are uncomfortable parallels with Primitive accumulation.
    The concentration of Wealth and capital going on presently I see as part of the process the Coercive aggregation is a logical corollary of a System that becomes totally concentrated into an Oligarchic Corporate state.

  3. Anchard says:

    Roger:

    Thank you for the comment – the concept of coercive aggregation is something that I’ve become very interested in (and needed to make up a name for) across a number of settings, and it’s reassuring to see that I’m not the only one who sees similarities across many of these crises. And it does relate to primitive accumulation, though I’m not to the point of looking at aggregation as an inherent feature of capitalism in the way that someone like David Harvey might. I think it’s perhaps closer to my intent to say that coercive aggregation can act as a diffusion mechanism for market risk that operates independently of intent, and that it’s a result of decisions made out of political expedience (or ideological bent) rather than an inevitable outcome of the existence of markets.

    You might have seen this already, but in case you haven’t, Saskia Sassen is doing some interesting work with PA. This one is a good place to start:
    http://www.columbia.edu/~sjs2/PDFs/savage.pdf

    • Roger says:

      Hi,

      Thanks for the link I will enjoy ( If that the right word) reading that it looks interesting.
      I have been reading Michael Perlemans Invention of Capitalism and have started watching David Harveys online Course in Reading Das Kapital. Whilst i studied A level Economics and have a degree in Land Economy ( Urban Estate Management) quite honestly I have discovered that my education hid as much fromme as it actually revealed of how the Economic System works and for whos benefit.

      Your Blog will help me a lot my Goal is to do some activism in the field of Mortgage Reform in The Uk. I live in Sweden now and have become rather disillusioned with my own country My Partner is Swedish and we wanted our Children to grow up in a more pluralist society.

      I’ll keep reading and learning and tweeting I am trying to raise awareness of those I know and love to hopefully get people concerned about what is being done against our wishes and our interests.

      Thanks for replying to my comment,

      Best Wishes,

      Roger

  4. Pingback: Weekend music | aluation

  5. Pingback: Coercive aggregation vs. primitive accumulation | aluation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s